Everyone's Doing It: Fashion Brands Take on Social Media

Amelia

neorealismo
Joined
Mar 6, 2004
Messages
17,609
Reaction score
3
From: http://www.wwd.com/media-news/everyones-doing-it-brands-take-on-social-media-2318508//?full=true

brands01.jpg


For fashion companies, 2009 is turning out to be the year of social media.

Once reluctant to cede control, brands and retailers from low to high are embracing social media and using it to boost sales and brand awareness. Having a presence on the top five social sites — Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, Flickr and YouTube — is de rigueur. The top luxury fashion brands on Facebook in terms of fans are Gucci, Chanel, Dolce & Gabbana, Ralph Lauren, Coach and Prada (although the Prada page is an unofficial one), according to New York University professor of marketing and Red Envelope founder Scott Galloway. Luxury fashion brands with the most Twitter followers are Vuitton, Tory Burch, Yves Saint Laurent and Christian Dior.

“Traditionally, luxury brands built relationships with customers through flagship stores, traditional public relations and advertising,” said Galloway. “Now they’re building relationships through Facebook, user reviews and consummating the transaction [online].” Of course, the product remains paramount, he said.

But companies now are going way beyond simply posting pages on those sites. They’re building their own social networks, games, iPhone applications and cross-platform advertising campaigns, and partnering with third-party social sites focused on fashion, such as the search engine Shopstyle, the fashion social network and outfit-sharing site Chictopia, and the outfit-building site Polyvore. For several years, they have been reaching out to bloggers and writing their own blogs, which boosts their rank in searches. Macy’s, Urban Outfitters, Zappos and other retailers have found user reviews (and user-contributed photos and videos) increase sales. Saks Fifth Avenue, Urban Outfitters and others show which items are most popular among shoppers, which can push a popular item to selling out.

Despite all the hype and hubbub, though, and the success of eBay, Etsy and Amazon, these remain early days for social media and fashion. Threadless, the small online retailer of crowd-sourced graphic T-shirts, is one of the first successful apparel makers whose business model is based on social media, and so far no designer has made their name using the medium.

Some brands, especially luxury ones, remain reluctant to dive too deeply into the social media waters. NYU’s Galloway last week released the first annual ranking of the digital competence of luxury brands, called the Digital IQ Index. A group of 109 companies were evaluated and ranked on a variety of metrics, including the interactivity of their site, e-commerce, traffic and how well they use social media.

The winner in the fashion category was Louis Vuitton, closely followed by Ralph Lauren. Marc Jacobs and Yves Saint Laurent were described as “challenged,” and Bottega Veneta was called “feeble.” Stila and several watch and jewelry companies also fell into that category.

Prada ranked as “gifted,” but only because it is one of the most highly searched fashion terms on the Web and therefore has huge amounts of traffic. Otherwise, the site scored poorly. “If it doesn’t get its act together, it’s going to experience a dramatic fall from grace,” Galloway said.

While the social Web is probably having the biggest impact on media, music, entertainment and making personal connections, in the fashion sphere, the Internet has made celebrities of Cory Kennedy, Fred Figglehorn, Scott Schuman of the Sartorialist, Yvan Rodic of Facehunter and Perez Hilton, among others. In fact, so much so that Schuman and fellow bloggers Garance Doré, Tommy Ton and Bryan Boy were given front-row seats at the D&G show in Milan on Thursday, complete with desks and laptops for instant transmission, knocking the likes of Neiman Marcus’ Burt Tansky, Saks’ Stephen I. Sadove and other retail heavyweights to the second row.

Another big change is that people who love fashion and are driven to constantly seek out new things can upload photos of their own discoveries or see what people around the globe are wearing in a minute, just by going to one of the dozens of photo-sharing or streetwear blogs, such as Schuman’s, that chronicle fashion. It is more immediate, in-depth and less mediated than traditional media. What’s more, it has accelerated the spread of trends around the world, users say. Print magazines have responded by posting street photos on their own Web sites.
According to a study released in July by Hill & Knowlton, 27 percent of Generation Y say they are influenced by an “online community or blog,” compared with 9 percent of Baby Boomers and 19 percent of Generation X. Meanwhile, traditional media continues to be important among all age groups, with 19 percent of respondents saying they are influenced by print articles and 12 percent by radio or television programs.

In the past six to nine months, retailers have joined social sites in droves. According to the publication Internet Retailer, 56.8 percent of the Internet Retailer Top 500 have a page on Facebook, 41.4 percent have a channel on YouTube, 28.6 percent are on MySpace and 20.4 percent are tweeting.

The most obvious and measurable effect of what Galloway has termed “social media optimization” is directing traffic and sales to a company’s Web site. Search engines are still the king of traffic, followed closely by the e-mail messages most retailers send out daily, but social media is growing quickly.

As a result, it is rare these days to find a fashion company with e-commerce that isn’t doing something with social media. Juicy, St. John, Tory Burch, Ralph Lauren, Gucci, Vuitton, Oscar de la Renta, Sears, Urban Outfitters, American Apparel, Topshop and Wet Seal are some of the better-known brands that have been at the cutting edge of using it in innovative ways to boost brand awareness and sales and communicate with their customers.

“Some sites are now getting 10 percent or more of their traffic from Facebook,” said Galloway. Two years ago, it was zero. The fastest-growing segment on Facebook is 45- to 55-year-old women, which is the sweet spot for luxury brands to target. Facebook is among the top 10 referral sites for more than half of the top luxury brands, he said.

Brands that have a strong social media optimization strategy — with a presence on all five sites or more — could be getting a third of their traffic from social media sites, according to Galloway. What’s more, he warned, companies that embrace social media could potentially have double the online traffic in the next few years versus those that don’t.

But traffic is just the tip of the iceberg. “Branding online primarily will happen through social media,” said Marco Corsaro, founder and chief executive officer of new-media consultancy 77Agency, which has been holding social media seminars for luxury marketers. “The only question is how big this will be.”

Among the agency’s fashion clients, the majority of traffic comes from people typing in the URL directly, the second from Google and the third from Facebook, he said.

Another benefit of social media is that it allows companies to understand their customers and get feedback from them, according to firms who use it.

Saks, Theory and Topshop are among the fashion companies that have created events or campaigns that mash together the online and offline worlds. “Integrating offline and online is something we’re doing more and more of,” said Topshop head of marketing Sheena Sauvaire. “Our customer is online all the time now. It’s increasingly the medium they’re using.”

The company was one of the first to have a widget on Facebook, which shows the latest looks each week. Shoppers can click through to the Topshop Web site to buy. Even before the company had an official page, about 20 percent of its online traffic was coming from Facebook — either from the unofficial page or the widget, said Sauvaire.
 
Topshop’s blog is the home for everything that inspires the staff, and everyone in the office contributes. “Maybe they’ve gone to a fantastic exhibition or gig or they’ve seen an amazing pair of vintage shoes in a shop,” she said. Many customers comment, “so it’s becoming a great forum to hear what people think of our brand and product,” she added.

Two people on the e-commerce marketing team focus on digital marketing, of which social media plays a big part.

American Apparel is one of the biggest online advertisers, with more than 100 million impressions every month, much of it on niche social sites that its customer frequents. In August, the retailer ran ads on Chictopia featuring users on the site who were also fashion bloggers. The ads also ran on the blogs. One of the models also became a photographer for the company.

“They converted very well, although I can’t give you specific numbers,” said American Apparel’s Ryan Holiday, who handles the company’s online advertising. “A big part of it was showing that American Apparel is paying attention, and we appreciate the contribution these girls and these sites are making to the industry. We’re trying to look at advertising as more than just a way to put our ad on a site and hope it generates sales. We’re using them as a way to become active or support or be a participant in some of these communities.”

Social media is so pervasive in everything the company does that Holiday does not see it as a separate form of marketing or Internet activity. Both print and online advertising are important, he said. “Offline American Apparel ads — people talk about them; they are a source of discussion and controversy. I think the term is ‘social objects.’ That’s how our Internet ads work, too. In our case, there’s no distinction between social media [marketing] and advertising. If our advertising isn’t social, then it’s not working.”

Yet, according to Forrester Research Inc., companies are shifting their marketing dollars away from traditional media and toward interactive marketing. The category will grow to $55 billion and represent 21 percent of all marketing spending in 2014, the company predicted in a July report.

The study surveyed 204 marketers in a variety of industries, including finance and health care, and 60 percent said they planned to increase their budget for interactive marketing by spending less on traditional marketing. Direct mail, newspapers and magazines were forecast to take the biggest hits. This year, marketers will spend $716 million on social media marketing, with the bulk of their online advertising budgets going toward search, display advertising and e-mail. Forrester predicts social media will see the steepest growth of any vehicle over the next five years, with a compound annual growth rate of 34 percent.

Sixty-four percent of respondents said they are involved in social media, and 22 percent said they plan to be by the end of this year.

A small online streetwear boutique in the heart of Silicon Valley with employees who are veterans of digital companies is a case study in how to use social media. Moxsie.com made its debut in December and specializes in unknown indie labels usually too obscure to show up on search engines.

“Independent fashion is all about finding, searching, wearing and discussing, so in a lot of ways, our category is tailor-made for social media,” said Moxsie.com ceo Jon Farhner. Farhner came from Zappos, and director of marketing Julie Kung is from Google. The Palo Alto, Calif.-based company received $1.1 million in funding from Alloy Ventures in April 2008.

Blog outreach has helped the unknown company create trust among potential shoppers, and the company uses Twitter to introduce new lines. Rather than use Twitter to hard sell, the company uses it to inform people about “cool stories” about designers and the inspiration for a product.
When Moxsie introduces a new brand, Kung targets a small number of fashion bloggers who retweet her comments. To test the reach of the strategy, Kung tracked one URL (a brand page on Moxsie) and discovered it could have been viewed by 25,000 people (if they were checking Twitter at the time). It received 2,000 click-throughs — at no charge to Moxsie.

“You can’t just put up a billboard and expect there to be a reaction,” said Farhner. “The interaction is directed by the community. You can’t disrupt the flow — you have to contribute to the interaction, rather than telling people to do things, or they reject you.”

About 30 percent of Moxsie’s traffic is direct, meaning someone types in its URL. Kung said they suspect much of that comes from social media such as blogs, but it can’t be traced. About 40 percent is search the company pays for, and organic search is 10 percent. E-mail is 15 percent.

The company updates its Facebook feed three to four times a week and is popular on Polyvore. Moxsie reshot its clothes without models so the images would be easy to use on the site.

“Polyvore stands out as being the most successful for us,” said Farhner. “Our stuff has been picked up thousands of times,” and people do actually click through and buy, he said.

Moxsie has partnered with Chictopia and also has its own blog, as well as widgets that show new arrivals in the sneaker and jewelry shops. The company would consider banner ads on sites with the right demographic, such as Polyvore and Facebook, but they are not as targeted as other methods, said Kung.

Designers also are exploring more unexpected initiatives. Ralph Lauren earlier this month introduced a second iPhone application with social features. Shoppers can customize Rugby clothes with patches, share and vote on designs and order them over the iPhone. Looks can be e-mailed, posted on Facebook or sent to the Rugby gallery, which will appear on the Rugby site, in the iPhone app and also in store windows in San Francisco and New York.

During New York Fashion Week, Norma Kamali and Jillian Lewis unveiled their collections virtually as well as on the runway, with avatars and virtual clothing on Roiworld and Cellufun.

Another Internet start-up, Enveme, is using a virtual world as well as other forms of social media and music to foster community and drive traffic to its online clothing store as well as provide a revenue stream. Its virtual world, EnveZones, is an area in the already established virtual world of VZones, which members can also access. Enveme is charging $11 a month for avatars clad in virtual versions of actual Enveme clothes. Whether the retailer flops and vanishes into obscurity or succeeds on the scale of a Hot Topic or Forever 21, it is, along with Threadless, one of the first fashion retailers whose business model is based on social media.

Whereas virtual worlds have yet to prove profitable for fashion companies, firms have had great success with outfit-building games.

Juicy and Wet Seal have added social networks built around Polyvore-style outfit-creation games to their sites. The results have been impressive. At Wet Seal, conversion rates double when a shopper visits the community, and 25 percent of buyers visit, said Wet Seal chief information officer Jon Kubo.

Juicy has more than 50,000 members in Club Couture. Those who visit increase page views 141 percent a visit, spend 150 percent more time on the site and buy 162 percent more often.

“The customers are talking to each other — you have to do very little work,” said Juicy Couture vice president of global marketing Frances Pennington.

“Social media is another way to take our advertising 360 degrees,” said Pennington. “We still believe in print media, and our fall campaign shows that. We have multiple page insets in many of the big books. We’ve taken to also showing it on our Web site. It expands our advertising, it doesn’t replace it. It’s just another platform.”

In June, St. John added a full-fledged social networking community similar to Facebook to its revamped online store. The company has not yet discussed publicly how it has been received.

As social media becomes pervasive, it is making it possible for anyone to share, collaborate with others and develop an audience or market online.

“Palo Alto isn’t the fashion capital of the world, and it shows you the power of what you can do on the Internet,” said Farhner of Moxie. “Blogs are coming from all over. You’d think they were from Manhattan with the confidence they talk about fashion. Because everything’s moving to the Internet, we’ve been embraced by boutique shoppers. Historically, this is a category that wouldn’t have worked online. You have to look at it as a changing landscape. Five years ago, two sisters in Atlanta wouldn’t have a blog that 150 people comment on. These are all new things,” he said.
[source: wwd]
 
Social Media and Magazines

Not even luxury brands seem immune to social media, but there certainly seems to be certain brands who are using social media better than others. I'm studying how traditional media is transitioning and subsequently translating to the online media world and the many different outlets that exist online. In that too, others seem to be able to translate their magazines into an online format that is more engaging and appealing for various reasons.

Right now I'm specifically studying Vogue and Vogue.com. Style.com used to be other online "home" of Vogue, but Vogue has started to make and build its own domain. But what do you think of Vogue.com? Is Vogue translating online the way you would like? Or would you like to see something different (Anna on twitter perhaps?!)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Personally I believe that luxury brands need to be very cautious with this new trend. On one hand these social medias are a great way for brands to attain a large audience at a low cost. Also, if your brand doesn't have a Facebook page, a twitter account, an iPhone application, etcetera, you risk to "fall behind" the competition.

However, the idea of all these sites, and internet in general, is that it is accessible to everyone (the masses) as opposed to the luxury industry which is based on rarity, elitism and non-accessibility to the masses.

Which in consequence means that a luxury brand needs to work hard on making its internet platform coherent with the "values" of the brand - i.e balancing accessibility and exclusivity. (something that some luxury brands have proven to not be that good at doing...)
 
one of the most useful aspects of the social media phenomenon has come in the way it has began to eliminate the idea of anonymity on the internet. it's very easy to hold ardent and strong opinions about anything from politics to fashion while one sits under the mask of anonymity. however, part of the usefulness of the internet and social media circles around the ability of these houses to unveil the masses of the internet and parse out their actual customer base. with the rise of cookies and the popularity of websites like facebook, a retailer or fashion house knows whether or not the person representing themselves as a versace fan actually clicks on their ads, wanders around on their corporate website, and eventually makes a purchase.

on the flip side of the coin, within the world of day-to-day high-end retail, it allows personal shopppers and high-end sales associates to stay in contact with their actual customers and gain insights into how they live. it also allows them another channel to pursue sales opportunities to their best customers. while ten years ago, a sales girl at gucci may have had to run through her little book and call her best clients, she can now write on their walls, comment on their statuses, and send them personal invitations.

as this continues to blossom, this will become the future face of the high-end sales experience: the relationship building opportunities this media provides truly outshines everything that has come before in many remarkable ways from both a overarching way and an individual day-to-day way.
 
I think ALL industries should be embracing the use of social media. Its such an amazingly intimate insider's look that we are looking for and that can only help us learn and love a brand further. I love big names like DVF embracing it and tweeting away! all brands have to know how to maintain their brand and following but we've had to adapt to all new marketing mediums and this should be an exciting new challenge for fashion houses.
 
most of the people who i know who shop luxury brands..do NOT use things like facebook...or twitter...

i see mostly teens and twenty-somethings...
and bored moms or students...

and i'm certainly not going to 'friend' any salespeople on facebook...
:huh:...

i remain unclear on just exactly what is so great about a brand having a facebook page...
if i like a company and have placed an order with them...
i wind up on their mailing list and get regular *email updates* from them...
whether i want them or not!

so why do i need to 'like' them on facebook?
and why do i want them as part of my personal life?

i don't get it...:ermm:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
People pursue all kinds of self-expression. If a friend asks us for our opinion, we feel appreciated and happily give advice. If a space is created where we can unconditionally be ourselves, we feel encouraged to show it. That's my take on it. It's about creating an individualistic display. Some show it through their style, but most show it on their online profile. The movies, designers and books you 'like' say something about you because you nominate them for display. Do you stay up to date, do you 'dare' to have an opinion, do you know what you like, etc. I think people like to believe so. That fact is greatly used and abused on the internet by corporates who are looking for ways to increase sales. I think that's the only truth. :P Because that's the world today no?
This is an interesting documentary that explains it a bit better: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-century-of-the-self/
 
most of the people who i know who shop luxury brands..do NOT use things like facebook...or twitter...

obviously, that's clearly changing. most people -- whether they shop luxury retail or otherwise -- participate on social networking sites in some fashion. facebook alone has five hundred million members. the legions who keep stores like burberry, gucci, marc jacobs, chanel, vuitton, dior, et al afloat certainly make use of these websites. and, let's not forget, those big houses make up the majority of the luxury good market. the niche brands we tout on these websites exist on the margins.

i see mostly teens and twenty-somethings...
and bored moms or students...

all that have vuitton bags, chanel shades, burberry jackets, marc jacobs dresses, gucci baby bags, etc.

and i'm certainly not going to 'friend' any salespeople on facebook...
:huh:...

i remain unclear on just exactly what is so great about a brand having a facebook page...
if i like a company and have placed an order with them...
i wind up on their mailing list and get regular *email updates* from them...
whether i want them or not!

yes, but unlike traditional mail, one can "unlike" with the click of a button. have you ever tried to get off the gucci mailing list after making an impulse four figure purchase? for women who have "limited time," their stylists have much more intimate access to their lives than merely a facebook page. they're sending looks to their homes, they're going to their home for private fittings, they're inviting them into their stores after hours, they're calling them on the phone. facebook just extends that experience into a new media. it's not new behvaior, just new means. i've had sales people text me images of shirts that just arrive or shoes they i "can't live without" in order to get a quick sale.

so why do i need to 'like' them on facebook?
and why do i want them as part of my personal life?

i don't get it...:ermm:

the nature of all sales hinges on the notion of relationship building. it's only through relationship building that one can effect increasing and regular sales from a customer. i don't care if its a banana republic sales girl remembering her customer's dress size and things she has in her wardrobe or someone from harry winston reaching out to clients to invite them to an exclusive event. these retailers and brands have always sought more insight into the personal lives of their clients in order to better position themselves for the sale. these social networking sites just provide a different mean and format to do that.
 
I'm studying Advertising and Public Relations and we talk a lot about social media and "Web 2.0"

In my opinion this could go one of two ways:
  • luxury brands lose their inherent sense of luxury by becoming so accessible
  • or marketers find some way of keeping the mystique of the industry in a way that won't make their customers restless

I think it shows a somewhat selfish cultural shift, with people sharing all these things about themselves. Checking in to places. Posting pictures. Little status updates. Sort of selfish, myself included.

I think some interesting examples are
OscarPRGirl | twitter | tumblr | foursquare
She does Public Relations for Oscar de la Renta

Art of the Trench | website
Integrates social media with the site to show the versatality and style of Burberry trenchcoats. It allows user submissions, but they are selected before being featured. It also has professional shots as well. Also, people can comment and connect using Facebook.

The only problem is there is so much potential, but it's hard to figure out exactly what to do with it yet. After all it has developed so quickly in a short span of time!

And relationship building is necessary. But the tricky part is find a non-annoying way to do it. Geting ads in your e-mail inbox is not cool, but for a while that was the only way people could think of to reconnect with existing customers on a broad scale. Now there's social media, but it is NOT a one way street. I tend to unlike and stop following those who forget that.
 
mike...
i get why THEY would want to invade my personal life in order to increase their opportunities for selling me something...
i have a strong retail background and i am guilty of doing much of what you say myself with my regular customers and training my salestaff to do likewise...
minus the facebook.social networking component, of course...as it was many...many...years ago...
:innocent:...

what i DON'T get is why i (or anyone else) would enable that behaviour by adding them to my 'social' network...
i have actual friends...i don't need pretend ones who are just trying to sell me something...
one of my biggest pet peeves, actually, is people who do nothing but promote themselves and/or their business via facebook...

i feel like facebook is for friends and family...
and should be private...
otherwise it really isn't much fun...
cause you can't post anything that isn't completely neutral for fear that someone will see something that they shouldn't...
*not that i ever do (or say) anything that i shouldn't ...
:ninja:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Being online totally open and accessible doesn't bring anything. It's mostly just emptiness. You can't replace a soul.
 
I'm studying Advertising and Public Relations and we talk a lot about social media and "Web 2.0"

In my opinion this could go one of two ways:
  • luxury brands lose their inherent sense of luxury by becoming so accessible
  • or marketers find some way of keeping the mystique of the industry in a way that won't make their customers restless
I think it shows a somewhat selfish cultural shift, with people sharing all these things about themselves. Checking in to places. Posting pictures. Little status updates. Sort of selfish, myself included.


yes, time magazine itself made note of this trend in 2006 with it's person of the year: "you." with the naming of mark zuckerberg as this year's person of the year, we find the trend ongoing. however, as i said earlier, it's just a new format for people to share these things. people have done those activities for decades. one but need to read the correspondence between any number of historical figure to find them logging all manner of emotional detail and everyday trifle.

with regard to these luxury brands losing their luster because of these new social media, you'll find that these fears come about whenever a new format comes about. the reality remains that the younger generation doesn't really know about the auspices of prestige as they presented themselves in old media. for a fourteen year old girl, watching the holiday makeup collection video on chanel's facebook page has just as much impact as a similar feature might have had on "fashion file" twenty years ago or chronicled in a print feature in vogue magazine forty years ago.

The only problem is there is so much potential, but it's hard to figure out exactly what to do with it yet. After all it has developed so quickly in a short span of time!

And relationship building is necessary. But the tricky part is find a non-annoying way to do it. Geting ads in your e-mail inbox is not cool, but for a while that was the only way people could think of to reconnect with existing customers on a broad scale. Now there's social media, but it is NOT a one way street. I tend to unlike and stop following those who forget that.

it's only going to happen faster and faster and faster. that's the nature of technology. fortunately, fashion remains one of the best equipped sectors to handle this sort of change because it's very business pivots on non-stop change.

with all advertising, there's a fine line between aggravating and attention-grabbing. just ten years ago we were talking about "do not call" registries. and it still remains almost impossible to get off of some physical mailing lists. but from an advertising perspective, i think the metrics available with these web advertising (even facebook) allow businesses to spend so much more intelligently. it eliminates a lot of the guess work. you know EXACTLY who is "liking" certain items. you know exactly who is fiddling around on your website. you know who makes the purchase. that's something i feel that's very novel and game changing.
 
:innocent:...

what i DON'T get is why i (or anyone else) would enable that behaviour by adding them to my 'social' network...
i have actual friends...i don't need pretend ones who are just trying to sell me something...
one of my biggest pet peeves, actually, is people who do nothing but promote themselves and/or their business via facebook...

i feel like facebook is for friends and family...
and should be private...
otherwise it really isn't much fun...
cause you can't post anything that isn't completely neutral for fear that someone will see something that they shouldn't...
*not that i ever do (or say) anything that i shouldn't ...
:ninja:

while philosophically i agree with you, that's not where this entire social networking thing finds itself heading. many companies compell their workforce to involve themselves with their clients and customers through these social network platforms. so increasingly, it's not just a personal thing, but it's something more than that.
 
I personally don't think a luxury brand using social media in its various forms will dilute it or make it less exclusive: just because it is more "accessible" doesn't mean it is more affordable: Just because I can view a luxury brand item online doesn't mean I'll be able to afford it.

I think the danger can come from a personal website appearing "universal" and therefore bland. The label's unique stamp and history might get lost if care wasn't given to how the site is created. But I do think there are ways around that. That might be one reason why luxury brands might be reluctant to embrace online media.
 
Being online totally open and accessible doesn't bring anything. It's mostly just emptiness. You can't replace a soul.

That's true in the case where you have an intense emotional relationship with the person you're talking to. But otherwise I find it's almost better to talk through emails etc....keep things focused on what is said rather than who says it, how they say it....all those things that can derail one from the main issues.
 
mike...
i get why THEY would want to invade my personal life in order to increase their opportunities for selling me something...
i have a strong retail background and i am guilty of doing much of what you say myself with my regular customers and training my salestaff to do likewise...
minus the facebook.social networking component, of course...as it was many...many...years ago...
:innocent:...

what i DON'T get is why i (or anyone else) would enable that behaviour by adding them to my 'social' network...
i have actual friends...i don't need pretend ones who are just trying to sell me something...
one of my biggest pet peeves, actually, is people who do nothing but promote themselves and/or their business via facebook...

i feel like facebook is for friends and family...
and should be private...
otherwise it really isn't much fun...
cause you can't post anything that isn't completely neutral for fear that someone will see something that they shouldn't...
*not that i ever do (or say) anything that i shouldn't ...
:ninja:
People have different motives for liking something on Facebook. It might not be that you actively seek out the company on Facebook just to like them. Most likely, people will have friends who have an interest in fashion as well, so if one of their friends likes a page, other people might impulsively follow suit. That's basically the principles of a "trend," people doing something because someone else does it and makes it look appealing.

Of course, you have to realize what opportunities a Facebook page provides for not only the company, but for consumers as well. Yes, the company is ultimately trying to sell you something, but many times, a company releases exclusive offers, promotions, or other information on Facebook. People know they're already going to buy from that company at some point in time, just because they like fashion, so it's prudent to allow yourself to take advantage of offers given out by the company. And you can choose whether or not you want to view those offers. It's not like Facebook forces you to visit their page every time you login, and you can choose to exclude them from any updates on Facebook.

You're in retail, so compare using social media to asking someone to buy add-ons or complimentary pieces to their primary purchase. Where I work (Office Depot, so many customers are in small business), this would be suggesting ink, paper, and other things a small business owner or office worker would need. It has already been statistically proven that people interested in fashion often are technologically-inclined, at least a little, and it has also been observed that a large portion of people spend most of their Internet time on Facebook. So consider Facebook the store - instead of saying, at a store, "While you're here, would you like to pick up some ink or paper?", companies say on Facebook, "While you're online, you might as well look through some of our catalog." It's efficient and smart marketing.
 
Since this thread started I think that fashion brands have begun to embrace social media even more. It is not just about marketing to their customers but listening to them. I think with the financial environment being so tough and competitive brands are having to take advantage of every possible resource that is available to them.

For me social media is great way to find out about the latest fashions and trends.I actively explore brands and retailers through channels like blogs, Facebook and Twitter so that I can decide which clothes I want to buy. I like to hear what others have to say about a piece of clothing and which pieces people really like.
 
you just have to determine if social media usage is for your brand - your clients, people whom you're trying to reach may not be using it
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
210,774
Messages
15,127,809
Members
84,511
Latest member
wwandre
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->