Most abercrombie ads are too racy to show to children.... Some of their catalogs were available to people 18 and older, I thought...
I remember they did this one catalog a while back where almost everone in it was naked... and it showed one guy tied up... parents were outraged.. so they made it more exclusive..
I dunno... this all reminds me of the movie "The people Vs. Larry Flynt"... if you've seen it, you'll understand.
If certain rights are taken away from us, who is to say that all of our other rights will remain intact....
If a parent sees that a magazine is too adult for their child, they retain the RIGHT to not buy that magazine..
Just as people retain the right to not buy p*rno mags... It's our choice, that is important... not whether nudity is used in advertisements or not.
LOL, you probably already did your debate thing... but i thought I'd just add my two cents
I remember they did this one catalog a while back where almost everone in it was naked... and it showed one guy tied up... parents were outraged.. so they made it more exclusive..
I dunno... this all reminds me of the movie "The people Vs. Larry Flynt"... if you've seen it, you'll understand.
If certain rights are taken away from us, who is to say that all of our other rights will remain intact....
If a parent sees that a magazine is too adult for their child, they retain the RIGHT to not buy that magazine..
Just as people retain the right to not buy p*rno mags... It's our choice, that is important... not whether nudity is used in advertisements or not.
LOL, you probably already did your debate thing... but i thought I'd just add my two cents
Last edited by a moderator: